"The History of the Blues Excerpts Francis Davis "
See a Problem?
Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Friend Reviews
Community Reviews
About ten years after that, I helped plan and direct a "Blues Trip" for my college buddies group. We visited blues clubs, blues museums and the birthplaces and graves of blues musicians in Memphis, Clarksdale, and rural Mississippi. To prepare for the trip, I read this book. I learned so much about the history of blues music, but the book also helped me pick CDs to flesh out my collection! I've since put a "Blues Corner" in my basement, complete with a hand-painted sign strung with blue lights, album covers, posters, the collage from our trip, my old California BLUZLVR license plate, my music collection, a CD player, headphones and a blue easy chair. Geez - OCD much?
I've been wanting to give this book a reread for some time now. I think a lot of blues enthusiasts consider it to be a pretty important reference. When I mentioned it to my adult son, who went on the trip with us, he told me he listened to a segment on NPR about someone who died recently who had interviewed most of the famous blues players back in the day. He couldn't remember the interviewer's name. I checked Wikipedia to see if Francis Davis had died, and got an unrelated shock - not only is Francis Davis not dead, he is married to perhaps the most famous NPR personality ever - Terry Gross!
I think what Davis did best in The History of the Blues was to combine incredible research (the book was published in 1995, before research could be done on mainstream internet) with highly-thought-out analysis of who influenced who, and how and why, and how blues music related to other forms of popular music, and how blues reflected social issues, etc. He points out that the definition of blues is in itself problematic, and involves variables like racial sensibilities, geography, musical form, etc. Obviously there are overlaps with other music genres, including folk, gospel, jazz, soul, R&B, funk, rock, etc. Most of the audience for blues over the last 60 years has been white - many Blacks, especially northerners, consider blues music negatively regressive.
I was fascinated to learn more about the so-called Father of the Blues, W. C. Handy. I've put his autobiography on my Want To Read list. Handy was a bandleader, composer and music publisher. Although he was black, his lifestyle and musical tastes were closer to those of most white folks. His band played "respectable music". Then, around 1903, he had this (presumably life-changing) experience in Cleveland, Mississippi:
"I was leading the orchestra in a dance program when someone sent up an odd request. Would we play some of our 'native music', the note asked. This baffled me. The men in the group could not 'fake' and 'sell' it. They were all musicians who bowed strictly to the authority of printed notes. So we played for our anonymous fan an old-time Southern medley, a medley more sophisticated than native.
A few moments later, a second request came up. Would we object if a local colored band played a few dances?
Object! That was funny. What hornblower would object to a time-out and a smoke - on pay? We eased out gracefully as the newcomers entered. They were led by a long-legged chocolate boy and their band consisted of just three pieces, a battered guitar, a mandolin and a worn-out bass.
The music they made was pretty well in keeping with their looks. They struck up one of those over-and-over strains that seem to have no very clear beginning and certainly no ending at all. The strumming attained a disturbing monotony, but on and on it went, a kind of stuff that has long been associated with cane rows and levee camps.
The answer was not long in coming. A rain of silver dollars began to fall around the outlandish, stomping feet. The dancers went wild. Dollars, quarters, halves - the shower grew heavier and continued so long I strained my neck to get a better look. There before the boys lay more money than my nine musicians were being paid for the entire engagement. Then I saw the beauty of primitive music. They had the stuff the people wanted. It touched the spot."
...moreDavis starts with a discussion of pre-recorded music styles and winds his way through the decades to the 1993 Chicago Blues Festival. Everything in between is flawlessly researched and executed in a page turning, story telling style. Davis adds val
This is a great book! Francis Davis has put together a reference book on the blues that not only does an exquisite job at its intended purpose but is highly readable. I find any book on blues history pretty interesting but History Of The Blues is aces.Davis starts with a discussion of pre-recorded music styles and winds his way through the decades to the 1993 Chicago Blues Festival. Everything in between is flawlessly researched and executed in a page turning, story telling style. Davis adds valuable insight into the life and music of Robert Johnson without dedicating too much space to the man or waxing too star struck poetic. If fact, his coverage of many of the names and faces of the blues fleshes out, clarifies and expands on the writing of his predecessors. Davis takes a real no nonsense approach to his reporting that avoids hollow, wordy hyperbole or thinly guided plagiarism. His writing is new and refreshing and brings the reader a superior understanding of the subject matter.
This volume is a companion piece to a PBS series, also called History Of The Blues. I haven't seen this documentary but I would be interested to see if it holds up to the quality of this book.
History Of The Blues is so well written that I would have no reservations about recommending it as the perfect introduction to the blues, even over similar works by Lomax, Wardlow, Oliver, Palmer or other heroes of blues writing. It is perfect for the serious scholar or casual acquaintance of this music we call blues.
...moreHe covers the lives and styles of musicians that blues afficianados know (Robert Johnson, Big Bill Broonzy, Howlin' Wolf, Bessie Smith etc.) but the beauty of this history is the music of basically unknown masters of the blues, both male and female. There are extant, rare recordings of these individuals and it is worth the readers time to find them on YouTube or other sites and hear the beginnings of the blues...it is powerful music.
Muddy Waters had a great quote, "The blues had a baby and they named it rock and roll" and the reader can follow the natural progression through the year of blues to rock and roll. If you are not a fan of the blues, this book may not be for you but it is a wonderful reference for blues lovers and I would recommend it.
...moreHe gives an even-handed rundown--i.e. doesn't
eh.....it's an ok intro to the blues, but even some of the greats only get a few paragraphs. The author, who seems to know Jazz, Rock and Roll, C&W, Rap, Ragtime and R&B as well as Blues, spends much of his time discussing the economic, geographic and socio-cultural factors that shaped the Blues. That's interesting, as is his connecting the Blues to other genres, but it still boils down to a critic giving his impression of the "important" musicians.He gives an even-handed rundown--i.e. doesn't slight the popular Bluesmen in favor of the obscure--but he committs a cradinal sin in my book: he says all Elmore James' songs are basically variations on Robert Johnson's "I Believe I'll Dust My Broom." Everytime I hear someone say this I think to myself, this writer is either deaf, stupid or a big fat liar. At least, as I recall, the author does it jokingly and throws James a little praise as well. I don't know how critics can say things like, 'the musicians of the 30s probably built songs out of components that were around from before the turn of the century,' and then fault Elmore James for using some of those same components while praising Robert Johnson as THE Bluesman. Robert Johnson came after Son House, Tommy Johnson and several other Delta Blues founders. He was the LAST of the great Delta Blues guys, not the first. I wouldn't trade ten of him for one Elmore James.
...more"[T]here are people who grow up actually reading the Bible, especially in the Protestant South—people, both black and white, who accept what I read as lunatic ravings as both prophecy and literal history."
Lunatic ravings? Wow... a wee bit lacking in nuance, wouldn't you say? Still, even from arm's length his ear can be good, and at least
There's much in this one that is good and helpful, but Davis's distance from the originators of the tradition is a major Achilles' heel... Witness the following:"[T]here are people who grow up actually reading the Bible, especially in the Protestant South—people, both black and white, who accept what I read as lunatic ravings as both prophecy and literal history."
Lunatic ravings? Wow... a wee bit lacking in nuance, wouldn't you say? Still, even from arm's length his ear can be good, and at least some of his observations spot on.
...moreThough for me by the time we get to BB King and beyond I'm not so interested.
It's a nice collection of information, although you have to bear in mind a lot of history in this area is hard to substantiate.
For any blues lover, this book or a book like it is a must read at some point.
I f you want to know about the blues, it's history, the characters, the names, then this is a great book. I liked it at least.Though for me by the time we get to BB King and beyond I'm not so interested.
It's a nice collection of information, although you have to bear in mind a lot of history in this area is hard to substantiate.
For any blues lover, this book or a book like it is a must read at some point.
...moreOne valuable asset is the Appendix which consists of a three column timeline, placing milestones in blues history against other musical genres milestones. The third column sketches in the rest of the world. We find that in 1911 Hart Ward published (sheet music) "Dallas Blues", James Reese Europe a
A Five Star effort. The proof begins with it giving me a dose of the blues and continues into the time I spent gleaning one recording or another off my shelves or popping one out of YouTube. Good times.One valuable asset is the Appendix which consists of a three column timeline, placing milestones in blues history against other musical genres milestones. The third column sketches in the rest of the world. We find that in 1911 Hart Ward published (sheet music) "Dallas Blues", James Reese Europe appeared at Carnegie Hall, and the Titanic sank.
Before the end of the book, we have the history, a refreshing one at that. Much of the crud attendant to histories of the blues and jazz of days gone by were too painfully academic or race guilty. Of course, one must keep in mind that this history was published in 1995, which seems to me at first to be fairly new, but it means a quarter century has passed since the words were written and today. That means the author and I went from active 49-year-olds to an at least a bit creaky 72. This is difficult to comprehend, at least for me. It also means that 'the music scene' has been transformed a few times, even within the blues. (Yeah, 24 years, but a book is written before it is published, you see?) Between the timeline and the text are a bibliography and a discography. Both depress me: I'll never read even 15% of the books, and the discography makes my collection look sadly anemic. Ah well.
But forget all that. Get this book, put on a few blues tunes to listen to, and learn a bit about the men and women who gave us so much of themselves as they wrought the sound that goes around this book.
Recommended.
...moreI learnt a lot but there was a lot that they I probably haven't taken in. There is a good blues/music/history timeline at the back of the book A good book well structured, just a shame it only goes up to 1993.
I learnt a lot but there was a lot that they I probably haven't taken in. There is a good blues/music/history timeline at the back of the book ...more
Mr. Davis also struggles (as do most blues fans) with two tough questions. . . what ARE the blues, and wh Francis Davis has written an excellent book that covers the origins, motivations, and evolution of the blues. He mentions and describes all manners of characters, from the big names to some who played a lesser role. Because of the great scope, he doesn't always go into a lot of detail, but there's more than enough information to give the reader a solid foundation in the history of the blues.
Mr. Davis also struggles (as do most blues fans) with two tough questions. . . what ARE the blues, and what is the future of the blues? He gives some possible answers, and his own opinions on these conundrums. His selected discography is one of the best parts of this very fine book. Even though this book is over 20 years old, it is still a very valuable resource for any true-blue blues fan. ...more
Related Articles
Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/235069.The_History_Of_The_Blues
0 Response to ""The History of the Blues Excerpts Francis Davis ""
Post a Comment